Wearable Computers Should Never Have Cameras

The early inventors of wearables all told me — ‘Don’t put a camera on that thing!’

Clive Thompson
Debugger

--

Behold Facebook’s new Ray-Ban “smart” glasses — with two cameras, so you can feed pix to their feed all day long

Over a decade ago, I began reporting on “wearable computing.” Back in the ‘90s and ‘00s, this meant interviewing DIY hardware hackers who’d built their own rigs.

They discovered some pretty cool uses for a head-mounted computer. Often they used their wearable as a form of “extended memory” — they’d jot down notes on the fly and retrieve them when needed, even years later, peering into their tiny eye-level screens. They also liked to engage in ambient, floating text-chat with friends. Wearables, they all told me, could amplify your cognition.

But the one thing nearly everyone told me?

If you put a camera on your wearable computer, it creeps people out.

“In the early days, people had this allergic reaction to the idea that people would be recorded,” as Thad Starner, a wearable pioneer, told me in 2011. It was obvious why. If you had a camera mounted on your head, everyone around you became deeply self-conscious, worried that you were recording something they were doing in private. As a result, Starner’s hand-built, head-mounted wearable generally didn’t have a camera.

--

--

Clive Thompson
Debugger

I write 2X a week on tech, science, culture — and how those collide. Writer at NYT mag/Wired; author, “Coders”. @clive@saturation.social clive@clivethompson.net